Is the New Simplified Option for Claiming Home Office Deduction Better Than The Old One?

I have a home based business. All home based business owners should understand what the IRS is up to lately in their attempt to help us. The Internal Revenue Service released a statement reminding home-based business owners to claim their home office deductions using the new simplified option. Capped at $1,500 per year based on $5 a square foot for up to 300 square feet, this new optional deduction will reduce the paperwork and record keeping burden of small businesses. The new option is available starting with the 2013 return taxpayers are filing today. Instead of filling out a 43-line form complete with complex calculations of allocated expenses, carryover of unused deductions and depreciation, taxpayers will only need to complete a short worksheet in the tax instruction and enter the result of their return. In 2012, 3.3 million taxpayers claimed home office deductions which totaled to nearly $10 billion.

April 15 is tax time again but the simplified option to claim home office deductions has gotten everyone beaming with joy. This simplified option is particularly beneficial to many real estate professionals who have home offices. However, did the government rip us off by using this new simplified plan?

The IRS will lead you to believe that the simplified method is best because the regular method requires too much record keeping. However, it will only be a good idea to use the new simplified home office deduction only if the deduction you could obtain using the regular method is not much more than $1,500. For example, an entrepreneur with a 100 square foot home office who pays $1,000 a month in rent and utilities would qualify for a $500 deduction with the new simplified option. However, with the regular method, he can obtain a $1,200 deduction which is 10% of $12,000 for a year’s rent. Typically, people with large homes and big home offices will find the regular method a lot more advantageous since their deductible expenses will exceed $1,500. Not being able to deduct depreciation does not make the new option better for homeowners as well.

This means that you should figure out the amount of your deduction using both methods to determine which would give you the bigger deduction. Although the regular method might require more record keeping, you will be able to keep more of your money. Whichever you do choose, you are not obligated to use it in the succeeding year.

So if you choose to have a simplified option this year and find it not convincing, you can always switch back to the regular method for your 2014 taxes.  I am not a CPA, Enrolled Agent or Certified Tax preparer. Please consult your CPA or tax attorney for additional information and advice.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Lender-Mandated Credit Overlays Undermine the Mission of the GSEs

Imagine that you're a borrower with a credit score of 580 or worst yet no credit at all.  You have what the Lenders call alternative credit (rent, utilities, cable & phone bill and etc.).  You are employed with a qualified debt to income ratio and have saved a down payment of at least 3.5% and maybe some of your closing cost. On paper, you seem like a perfect candidate for an FHA loan. However, your lender denies your loan application because of your low FICO score or because you do not have a FICO score.  Even though you have met the U.S. government's requirements for getting an FHA loan, your lender declines to approve your loan because of their credit overlays.  This scenario is being played out every single day at all the major banks, credit unions and many mortgage banks.  Who is in charge of the guidelines and parameters by which banks can lend?  Are the additional credit requirements legal or discriminatory based on federal law?  I believe...
Read more

Goal Setting versus Goal Achievement

As a Coach and a Sales Manager I enjoy working with goal achievers.  They excite me and make me better as a coach and a manager.  I desire to be around them and welcome opportunities to conduct joint sales calls.  There are goal achievers in every office and you know them immediately when you meet them or you know them by their incredible productivity.  These special people take the goals that have been given to them or that they have set for themselves very seriously.  It’s a matter of pride and professionalism to achieve their goals.   They are like Samurai warriors who live the code of “death before dishonor”.  Goal Setters on the other hand are also great people but all they do is talk about what they are going to do and never get to it.  They are experts in coming up with excuses about why they fail and are unable to achieve the goals they set for themselves or the goals assigned to them.     My goal in working ...
Read more

JPMorgan Got Off Easy: Why The Settlement Is Not Justice

The Justice Department, along with federal and state partners, announced this week a $13 billion settlement with JPMorgan - the largest settlement with a single entity in American history.   This settlement brings to a resolution the federal and state civil claims arising out of the packaging, marketing, sale and issuance of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) by JPMorgan, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual prior to Jan. 1, 2009. I know that there are many politicians who are happy that the Justice Department settled with JP Morgan.    I am disappointed, though, with all the statements in the press release from the various District Attorneys who are claiming victory and that justice has finally been done.   It is ridiculous and it is politics as usual.   Am I alone here?   Have we lost our minds as a country?   How is this a day of celebration?   The fact that this settlement represents the largest settlement with a single entity...
Read more